POLICY STATEMENT
ON STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT

. . . assessment should be first and foremost about improving student learning and secondarily about determining accountability for the quality of learning produced. In short: Though accountability matters, learning still matters most.

– Thomas A. Angelo

GOAL
The goal of Student Learning Assessment at Capital Community College is to gather selected information on student learning for the purpose of improving the College's educational programs and students' educational experience.

GUIDING QUESTIONS
In selecting areas of student learning to be assessed, every assessment project will be limited to activities that respond to the following questions:

    Content
  1. What do students know?
  2. When do they know it?

    Justification
  3. Who needs this information for decision-making?
  4. How will we use this information to enhance student learning?
PRINCIPLES
  1. Support of learning The purpose of Student Learning Assessment is to gather information about what students learn and when they learn it in order to assist the College in its stimulation and support of learning.
  2. Utility Student Learning Assessment is part of a larger Institutional Effectiveness process of ongoing self-study with the commitment to use resulting assessment information in planning and budget decisions.
  3. Parsimony No assessment information will be sought unless there is a clear necessity for it and a commitment to its constructive use. Nothing will be selected for assessment unless the relevant units are willing to acknowledge and act on the results.
  4. The Knowable Core For marketing, accreditation, and articulation purposes, programs may offer broad or detailed descriptions of activities consistent with the College's mission and vision. However, for assessment purposes, goals will be limited to those that mark the essential core of each program, and related outcomes will be selected for measurability. The College acknowledges that many of the educational outcomes of which it is equally proud may not be measured in any formal assessment.
  5. Long Slow Distance Although units may prepare detailed goal-oriented plans to guide routine activities, only a few goals and outcomes will be selected for assessment in any one period. After the unit incorporates the results of this limited assessment, it may select a few other goals and outcomes for the next assessment period. No unit will try to assess every goal in every assessment cycle.
  6. Group Snapshots The Student Learning Assessment project is designed to take snapshots of cross-sections of students within programs, reporting on aggregates and looking for gaps and patterns that can help in improving whole programs. The CCC assessment design does not focus on the evaluation of individual students or individual courses. Teachers and departments continue those responsibilities as always.
  7. Local Control The CCC assessment design responds to local needs. Some assessment data may be of use for accreditation or coordination with systemwide initiatives, and the college may gain some information about our students' standing by national norms. However, a local Assessment Oversight Committee will control the collection and promulgation of assessment-generated information, holding to the goal stated above and guided by the questions enumerated in support of the goal.


DESIGN FOR STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT
at Capital Community College

(Institutionalizing Assessment through and beyond Title III)

STRUCTURE

  1. Oversight Committee A Student Learning Assessment Oversight Committee will be appointed to watch over ongoing student learning assessment and to maintain an interest in the structural and political issues raised by the process. Such a perspective will enlarge the scope of vision available to assessment practitioners and management, and will be focussed on clarifying connections among assessment activities and other college activities and policies. The Oversight Committee will include faculty from several departments as well as representatives of other academic and student service units. The Oversight Committee will make recommendations about assessment policies and procedures concerning matters such as:
    • Coordination (both links with and independence from) Institutional Effectiveness efforts, program reviews, and accreditation processes
    • Coordination among departments
    • Use or publication of assessment data beyond the department level
    • Methods of evaluating assessment findings
    • Use of nationally standardized tests
    • Control of unintended consequences or perceived abuses of SLA process
    • Coordination of CCC assessment efforts with systemwide assessment plans
    • Response to problems or opportunities as they arise
  2. Assessment Coordinator The Academic Dean will appoint and supervise a Student Learning Assessment Coordinator who will be an academic staff person on release from selected other assignments for at least a two-year term. The Assessment Coordinator will consult regularly with the Oversight Committee and will work closely with other relevant governance committees (CAP, PRC, etc.) and with department chairs to maintain a cooperative and participatory assessment process.
  3. Assessment Liaisons At least three faculty members (preferably five, one from each department) will work with the Assessment Coordinator each year as Faculty Liaisons. They may be on release time or count their work as a major Additional Responsibility.

policy graph

IMPLEMENTATION (with guiding questions referenced for each step)

    Definition of Program Goals
  1. Academic departments will define core goals for each program. Department members will develop core objectives and measurable outcomes for each course. On an annual basis, departments will review course objectives and program goals to assure that courses are addressing the program goals and that outcomes mark the necessary learning continuities for program coherence. (Q #3 & 4)
  2. For interdisciplinary programs (Learning Communities, General Education, Developmental Education, etc.), appropriate committees will define program goals and course objectives and review coherence annually. Across departments, the college governance structure will use program goals and course objectives for curricular planning and policy review. (Q #3 & 4)

    Embedded Program Assessment Measures

  3. When a program is scheduled for Program Review, the sponsoring department or academic body will select the key program goals to assessed and will define measures for relevant student learning outcomes. The program's coordinator will arrange for implementation of the measures, receiving assistance from the Assessment Team. (Q #1, 2 & 3)
  4. For each college program in years between Program Reviews, program staff will select one goal to assess each year, and will define measures for relevant student learning outcomes. The program's coordinator will arrange for implementation of the measures, receiving assistance from the Assessment Team. (Q #1, 2 & 3)
  5. The Assessment Coordinator will enlist clerical and other support from IR and Academic Dean's offices, arrange for collection and tabulation of assessment results, and report results to departments for incorporation into further planning. The Assessment Coordinator will also present summaries of implementations to the Oversight Committee for identification of patterns that could help shape the assessment process. Departments will evaluate and use results for program improvement on an ongoing basis. (Q #4)

    Testing, Qualitative Measures, and Other Measures of Student Progress

  6. When the Oversight Committee determines that specific tests (standardized or local) should be used for students across programs, the Committee will ask the Assessment Coordinator to consult with relevant College offices to define a testing cycle and logistics. The Assessment Coordinator and Team, with support from IR and Academic Dean's offices, will oversee collection, tabulation and reporting of results as stated under item 5 above. (Q #1, 2, 3, & 4)
  7. When the Oversight Committee determines that focus groups, surveys, or other qualitative measures should be implemented, the Committee will ask the Assessment Coordinator to consult with relevant College offices to design the measures and determine logistics of administration. The Assessment Coordinator and team, with support from relevant College offices, will arrange for collection, tabulation and reporting of results as stated under item 5 above. (Q # 1, 2, 3, & 4)
  8. The Oversight Committee will seek ways to use other available data to understand student learning patterns. These initiatives may include analysis of transcripts, placement testing patterns, persistence and retention data, etc. The Assessment Coordinator and Team will work with college units to gather information for such initiatives. The Assessment Coordinator and Team will arrange for collection, tabulation and reporting of results as stated under item 5 above. (Q #1, 2, 3, & 4)

    SLA Design 12/01



SLAT Home-Page
Capital Community College